Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

25
Rate Hasina's performance over the years.
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

apart from her being a tyrant, how well did she contribute in benefiting our country in any ways? lets face it.

Comments

5/10

Good stuff: Stability, Secularism (in a country rife with conservatism), Diplomacy (enabling Bangladesh to have a somewhat bigger role internationally than before), securing greater foreign investment, some major welfare projects (such as proving homes to homeless)

Bad stuff: Continuously corrupt administration, dictatorship, failure to reduce external shocks on economy, inability to prepare suitable candidates to replace her afterwards, poor resolution of some issues (e.g. building power plants but not securing a supply of resources to run them)

[not loaded or deleted]

When I say secularism I mean compared to the other available major parties. And the percentage of FDI isn't what I meant but rather the total amount itself. I don't think it's a good sign if an economy becomes increasingly foreign dominated. And yes the diversification is still low, but it's not exactly stagnant.

Author
Account Strength
60%
Account Age
2 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
141
Link Karma
79
Comment Karma
62
Profile updated: 5 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago