I have nothing against blondes. Two of my ex's were blonde. Both were very attractive and one in particular was a really sweet girl who through her generosity, put a lie to the idea that all whites are [fill in the blank pejorative].

At the same time, it is crazy to me to what degree European society (including the one in America) holds up blonde woman as the ideal. Even when I dated those girls, I'd get constant compliments from other men, well beyond what I'd get when I'd dated a more attractive non-blonde.

In HS, a friend of mine (WM) kept talking about how blondes were "10's" in his view, he's say this even of ones that had a nasty face. It's this indiscriminate preference for those who blonde hair that I find ridiculous.

A lot of blondes I've seen don't have good features. Esp. on the West Coast, I see a lot of them with man-jaws, big noses, masculine features. Or otherwise just a very plain look. Despite that, white men put them on a pedestal.... all because their hair is yellow.

The privilege that these yellow-hairs have is kind of crazy. That's also why you see so many bottle-blondes, even one's whose face isn't aligned with blonde hair.

The entitlement of these women is next-level. (Combine that with feminism's dictum that "women aren't wrong" and that when women are shitty people that's actually being "strong and independent1!1!!1!", it only compounds.)

But why wouldn't it be when white men (and those trying to be like them) arbitrarily put a high value on those having urine-colored hair?

The saddest thing is seeing a middle-aged Karen with yellow hair (bottle or not); where her privilege has faded due to her old-age and all thats left is displacing anger at being treated like a normal person on other unfortunate suburbanites.

So my question: IS there urine-haired privilege?