Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

2
A question on population growth and itโ€™s obvious meaning that the world is not 6000-7000 years old.
Post Body

One of the challenges of a young earth creationist view I have always used is the speed of which the tectonic plates would have had to move to get into the position they are in now. But while reading a lot about population ethics and statistics on how we will have grown as a species over even recent years, believing that the human population is at its current size after 6000 years from 2 people is fucking mental. Especially considering a disruption from an alleged flood.

Does anybody know anywhere I can look to see how fast our ancestors would have had to reproduce to get to our size now. Generally interested.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
11 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
42,953
Link Karma
5,550
Comment Karma
35,993
Profile updated: 1 month ago
Posts updated: 6 months ago
Pastafarian

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
4 years ago