This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

0
How fair is it to say that the colloquial use of the words philosophy and science reflect rationalism and empiricism accordingly?
Post Body

I have been thinking about how in the past there was not necessarily a distinction between a scientist or a philosopher. They were both intellectual truth seekers.

Nowadays people seem to use the terms science and philosophy contrastingly which has always confused me because I see science as a successful offshoot of a particular philosophy, namely empiricism.

I’ve made sense of this contrast by essentially equating the word philosophy with rationalism - the attempt to gain knowledge through rational means, while equating the word science with empiricism - the attempt to gain knowledge through sensory means.

Is this a fair/accurate framework to understand the colloquial uses of these words?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
7 years
Verified Email
No
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
26,292
Link Karma
2,119
Comment Karma
24,108
Profile updated: 5 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
2 months ago