This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Hi, Iām new to posting in this sub and not sure if this is an appropriate place to discuss this topic. However, I need your help and your knowledge to understand this concept.
According to the explanation onĀ this page, the counterfactual conditional is defined as a sentence that assumes circumstances unlike the facts a speaker can perceive, e.g. āIf SallyĀ ownedĀ a donkey, sheĀ wouldĀ ride it.ā In this example, they placed the fake tense form āownedā into the condition clause and the past-inflected modal āwouldā into the consequence clause. As a result, we can see that Sally doesn't in fact own a donkey.
I have a question about this. What form should I use when the actual situation of the subject is unclear and the sentence expresses imagination? For example, I made the sentence āThat directorĀ wouldĀ hate this kind of movie [if heĀ sawĀ it]ā I don't know if the director has seen the movie, or if he likes it or not, but I know the director's character well, so I guess he would dislike that movie. In this context, is this treated as a counterfactual conditional sentence? Or should it be some other form of āIf he sees that movie, he will hate itā?
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 4 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/askphilosop...