Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

2
Counterfactual conditions with ambiguous facts.
Post Body

Hi, Iā€™m new to posting in this sub and not sure if this is an appropriate place to discuss this topic. However, I need your help and your knowledge to understand this concept.

According to the explanation onĀ this page, the counterfactual conditional is defined as a sentence that assumes circumstances unlike the facts a speaker can perceive, e.g. ā€œIf SallyĀ ownedĀ a donkey, sheĀ wouldĀ ride it.ā€ In this example, they placed the fake tense form ā€œownedā€ into the condition clause and the past-inflected modal ā€œwouldā€ into the consequence clause. As a result, we can see that Sally doesn't in fact own a donkey.

I have a question about this. What form should I use when the actual situation of the subject is unclear and the sentence expresses imagination? For example, I made the sentence ā€œThat directorĀ wouldĀ hate this kind of movie [if heĀ sawĀ it]ā€ I don't know if the director has seen the movie, or if he likes it or not, but I know the director's character well, so I guess he would dislike that movie. In this context, is this treated as a counterfactual conditional sentence? Or should it be some other form of ā€If he sees that movie, he will hate itā€?

Author
Account Strength
10%
Account Age
4 months
Verified Email
No
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
7
Link Karma
6
Comment Karma
1
Profile updated: 4 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
4 months ago