This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

2
Circle of Springs
Post Body

https://preview.redd.it/v8h3opqutq9d1.png?width=543&format=png&auto=webp&s=a0a4c24faa2d2fec2be1e96d0a081c1f31fa0c00

https://preview.redd.it/zuvlwywvtq9d1.png?width=538&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4ea1a653903e471d706f20324ea6bc9506b8979

The pages above discussed how to construct the matrix A that relates the elongations of each springs, e_i, and the movements of the masses, m_j.

I understood the material that's presented on these pages, and I do get the physical intuition behind the equations. For example e_2= u_2 - u_1 because suppose m_1 didn't move in a moment of time and m_2 moves downwards, then u_2 is ( ) and u_1 is 0 and the second spring will be stretched which corresponds to a ( ) elongation. But I have a problem in this subsection when the text starts discussing about circles of springs.

https://preview.redd.it/2h8llpr2vq9d1.png?width=547&format=png&auto=webp&s=db9e7a953e0c8a63f61c26d35b4799a0d64ab53e

Based on the given matrix A, why is the first equation of the system e=Au is e_1=u_1 - u_3 and not e_1=u_3 - u_1?

Why is that when u_3 moves downwards and let's say u_1 is fixed for a moment of time, the spring that connects mass 1 and 3 becomes compressed (elongation e_1<0)? Shouldn't it be stretched? Can you help me understand the physical intuition behind this equation e_1=u_1 - u_3 ?

Author
Account Strength
50%
Account Age
1 year
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
656
Link Karma
188
Comment Karma
468
Profile updated: 1 day ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
2 months ago