I'm going to try to avoid taking a stance in this initial post and just provide some background info. Comments should begin with "AFFIRM" or "NEGATE" and take a position on the resolution above.

The US has traditionally avoided international talks over a formal Code of Conduct in Outer Space. Recently the Obama administration has expressed intent to cooperate in treaty talks. Should the United States continue its new policy of dialogue to promote international cooperation, or should it leave the talks and maintain a more unilateral space policy in order to preserve its national security interests?

[1] - A pretty good summary of the Code of Conduct/debating points

[2] - Short document by the USDS regarding the administration's position

Definitions -

• "United States federal government" - pretty obvious, the government of the USA. More specifically, the Obama administration and the senate, as well as other governmental agencies involved in international negotiations over the code of conduct in space/US domestic ratification.

• "Ratify" - Signed and passed by the Senate, making it officially valid. In this case, I'm also referring to necessary actions leading up to ratification - such as negotiations over the substance of the treaty, etc. "Ratify" means more than just becoming a signatory; the US would actually have to abide by any provisions, not just vaguely show its support.

• "Code of Conduct" - a set of conventional principles and expectations that are considered binding on any member or signatory

Let's start a debate!