Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

11
Is there a point to Early Palace Guards?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

Is there a point for Juicy Legacy to get Early Palace Guards other than making them even more bonkers?

They start with cheaper TCs, cheaper outposts, hand-canon slits, and cheaper age-ups, so they don't need an armored unit to fend off other armored units. They can also fend off MAA with their zhu get spam easily.

So, I don't get why they get this, and I think it should be removed. Compared with china - they need two landmarks to unlock zhu ghe, and they still have a worse economy in feudal and fight mostly with spears and horseman.

But Juicy over-here can amass Zhu Ghes -a premium archer- and Early Palace Guards backed by cheaper TCs and hand-cannon slits for defense.

So, aside from having one of the best economies in feudal, they also have an army composition in Feudal that beats almost anything, for free- they just need to age-up, with their cheaper age-up, to get it.

It seems like too much. I think everyone agrees Juicy legacy is OP and overturned, and I think one way to fix it is removing early palace guards - just palace guards, like China.

Author
Account Strength
40%
Account Age
11 months
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
405
Link Karma
44
Comment Karma
361
Profile updated: 6 days ago
Posts updated: 2 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
10 months ago