"The nation of the Ni-Van has seen much turmoil politically. First, exploited by foreign powers, and then beset by political instability. However, with the rise of the new Pacific Union, we have an opportunity to pool our resources to benefit all of us and to improve the Pacific.

Not a union of colonisers or the wealthy, but a union of the disparate and the colonised. The Pacific Grouping and the National United Party are the only people reaching out to the core of this Pacific Union- the Pacific islands. While the Social Democrats hop across the Tasman Sea, speaking to white voters about why they should take pity on the poor Pacific, only the Pacific Grouping is reaching out to Pacific voters.

And that is sad, because the Pacific Union shouldn't be white politicians essentially soliciting votes to help save the poor browns. It's why Australia, a nation which is overwhelmingly white, who's indigenous people have no connection to ours, who only borders the Pacific, shouldn't be in the union.

What I, and what the Pacific Union want to see done, is investment in transport links. When islands get links to the outside world via airports, their economy improves, because what can take days or even weeks on a long-haul boat, now takes just a few hours on a plane.

Food and resources are able to be imported quicker. The islands are opened up to tourism. This is how we should use the Pacific Union. Not virtue-signalling to white people, but actually helping and reaching out to Pacific peoples, to the Ni-Van, and that is what the Pacific Grouping will aim for.

Thank you."