Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

6
Distinction in “learning to channel” vs “born with the ability”
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

Many times during the series, a distinction is made in women’s ability to channel. Some can be “taught to channel”, and a subset of those that can learn are “born with the ability”, meaning that eventually they will channel whether they are trained or not.

First I thought it was sort of the wizard vs sorcerer discussion, where theoretically anyone can learn to channel, but it comes much easier and more naturally to others.

But it’s established early on that channeling is semi-genetic, and the white tower has culled their own population be recruiting every channeler they can find. Not just anyone can learn to channel, you have to be, well…born with the ability to. Like with the Seanchan, not anyone can be a Sul’dam, you have to be able learn to channel.

So what I don’t understand is: 1. Why is this distinction made? Why is it “taught” vs “born”, if you have to be born with the ability regardless? It’s still channeling at the end of the day, and it still requires training to do it. 2. What even causes the difference? What is it that makes some people have the ability to channel naturally, and others could never know without training?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
8 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
139,670
Link Karma
48,256
Comment Karma
90,952
Profile updated: 2 days ago
Posts updated: 3 weeks ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
10 months ago