Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

11
Help me understand Correspondence 3 Teleportation
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

Reading just the core rulebook the guidelines seemed pretty clear to me. Using correspondence to teleport objects would be, at best, vulgar without witnesses. If you teleport you're gonna rack up some paradox. BUT, in How do you do that it talks about the Batman where you use the cover of darkness to essentially hide before you vanish such that any person nearby believes you to be basically sprinting away and hiding and thus the magic is coincidental instead of vulgar without witnesses. I'm trying to understand the system better and I can't understand why that should be any different from teleporting from one place with no witnesses to another place with no witnesses. Thanks!

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
11 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
13,201
Link Karma
1,427
Comment Karma
11,419
Profile updated: 14 hours ago
Posts updated: 3 weeks ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago