This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
According to popular wisdom - which may be incorrect of course, feel free to correct me - Gustavus Adolphus revolutionized battle tactics by introducing light weight field cannons and by assigning one or two of those to each of his infantry regiments/brigades. Those cannons were of around 3-pdr caliber if I understand correctly.
Now my questions is: why exactly was the size of 3-pdr chosen? There were plenty of cannons of both higher and lower caliber existing at the time. 6-pdr and 12-pdr were seemingly the typical cannons of the artillery train, but I can guess they were considered to large and heavy for the intended use. But lists of existing cannon types of the time (e.g. this) show a lot of smaller caliber cannons, to give some english examples: falcons, falconets, robinets, bases.
Why hasn't any of those types been chosen as the archetype of infantry support gun? They appear even lighter than the 3-pdr? Is there some reason behind the 3-pdr to give it a clear advantage? Do we have some insight into thought process of Gustavus Adolphus or whoever was the first to propose those?
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 3 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/WarCollege/...