Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

11
Why was ~3-pdr chosen as default for the 17th century regimental gun?
Post Body

According to popular wisdom - which may be incorrect of course, feel free to correct me - Gustavus Adolphus revolutionized battle tactics by introducing light weight field cannons and by assigning one or two of those to each of his infantry regiments/brigades. Those cannons were of around 3-pdr caliber if I understand correctly.

Now my questions is: why exactly was the size of 3-pdr chosen? There were plenty of cannons of both higher and lower caliber existing at the time. 6-pdr and 12-pdr were seemingly the typical cannons of the artillery train, but I can guess they were considered to large and heavy for the intended use. But lists of existing cannon types of the time (e.g. this) show a lot of smaller caliber cannons, to give some english examples: falcons, falconets, robinets, bases.

Why hasn't any of those types been chosen as the archetype of infantry support gun? They appear even lighter than the 3-pdr? Is there some reason behind the 3-pdr to give it a clear advantage? Do we have some insight into thought process of Gustavus Adolphus or whoever was the first to propose those?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
10 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
27,545
Link Karma
3,073
Comment Karma
24,250
Profile updated: 2 days ago
Posts updated: 7 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
3 years ago