Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

405
Is the CEO shooting protected by the literal reading of the 2nd amendment?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

"civilian forces that can counteract a tyrannical federal government"

In this case the health insurance company and its legal duty to provide profits to shareholders (as per federal courts), led to practices that caused thousands of civilian deaths.

The government (as lawmaker) sanctions the deaths, and can therefore be construed as tyrannical. This is then civilian force fighting back to protect people.

Surely this is what the US proclaims as the reason for arming civilians?

Comments

What are you taking? You’ve done some grand mental gymnastics that still fails to land anywhere near a logical conclusion

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
9 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
88,461
Link Karma
36,885
Comment Karma
51,045
Profile updated: 3 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 month ago