Review of Octokuro's OnlyFans

Name: Octokuro   OnlyFans: Link to OnlyFans   Website/Links: Link to Website

General Information

PPV/NO-PPV: PPV   Sub-Cost: $10   Face/No-Face: Face   B/G vs. Solo-only vs. Mix: Mix   Cosplay: Yes   Polished vs. Casual: Polished   Kinky vs. Vanilla: Kinky  

Subscriber Profile Ratings (out of 5)

Each of these profiles represents a type of subscriber, and I have developed a system to help rate a creator based on what may matter most to each of these!

• Lurker: 2.9
• Casual: 2.3
• Engager: 1.9

Overall Average Rating: (2.9 2.3 1.9) / 3 = 2.37

Disclaimer: My personal take score is not included in the ratings of the subscriber profiles.

Overall Review

Chat Experience: 1/5

"When I first reach out to content creators, I always introduce myself fully and am open and honest about why I am there: to review and also enjoy their content. I also drop a tip ranging from $5-10, more if it's a free account. I do this all to start off on a footing of respect. I won’t 'go-off' on this, but AI usage really bothers me when it's not disclosed. Octokuro clearly uses AI to deal with messaging:

“Hi. You want to get my content and interact with me, am I understanding correctly?💖”

They are technically correct, but this information pulled from my intro message to them was one sentence to four sentences explaining why I was there. That being said, when I messed with the AI a bit, it appeared I started dealing with a service agent or human. They respond quickly, they are kind, and they clearly want you to get the content you want. However, it is 100% not the creator. I am giving them a 1 because I just can't stand this business system. Just tell your subs it's not you and let them decide if they are okay with that or not."

Ads/Mass-Messaging: 2/5

Messages are random and spammy. Some were sent to hook me into conversations, like situations where you can respond to “maid is in front of you, are you grabbing butt or boobs.” But knowing this is AI driven? I don't see the appeal. The ads, though, are very revealing and do show what you are getting. So I am not giving her a 1. You definitely know what you are paying for when it comes to the ads and the mass messaging.

Content Quality: 3/5

I’d say really good production quality, it feels like signature western porn. It felt like I was on a polished porn website with a porn star. I found the content reflected pop culture references: Fall-out, Star Wars, anime, etc. The acting was steered more towards things that could be clipped and used for advertising. For example, if you watch the whole video, you find a lot of it is incredibly dramatic gagging and word-chewing sort of looking sex. It is well done if you are into that specific kind, but I found it overall a bit lackluster and uncreative. I want someone to at least do some original content and not feel like they are a “studio” that just churns out whatever seems to be “cool” that week. I’m giving this a 3 because I think they spend money to have decent quality gear and costumes, but overall I found it boring/uninspired.

On-Camera Performance: 2/5

She was confident and engaged in the videos. She clearly knows what she is doing and has a great body. As mentioned in other sections, this feels very “porn” to me. If she did a SFW video, I’d still think it was porn somehow, if that makes sense. It just has that overall vibe. A little bit airy, not a lot of story, just… sex. That's fine! Just not very entertaining.

Authenticity: 2/5

I had to lower the score here for their dishonesty with using an AI/Service. She is clearly not transparent about how she runs her page. I think a lot of larger stars tend to use services, but I just refuse to excuse omission of telling us you use a service. Just admit you have fans and it’s too much work, and you use a service for your 1 on 1 messaging. Boom. Done. Moving on. If you admit to it, then that's authentic to me. I don’t feel deceived. Since messaging is via service/AI, I am basing her authenticity on her posts' voice. She seems pretty engaging and appears in the videos to enjoy the sex she is having.

Frequency of Wall Posts: 4/5

She posts daily, both with small videos, pictures, and other content that keeps you informed and aware of what is maybe coming out, is about to drop, or has dropped. I actually thought her wall posts were good quality and informative. I am not an ad person, but she makes it feel more like movie trailers and promos, which feels very clean and professional. Nothing full-length is free on the wall, but the teasers are not censored, so I think all in all it’s a really good wall.

Tip Prioritization: 1/5

Whether you tip or not, you will get an AI/Service response. Does not even react to being given money. Not impressed.

Personal Take: 2/5

I really did not enjoy this page. One of the less liked ones for me. She is really pretty, and probably a wonderful human, but her business model feels detached to me. I have nothing against western porn and bigger sites, but I think OF and the idea of why I enjoy this type of sex work is that there are real people who are innovating and being intimate and vulnerable. I felt none of these key values in her content. She is hot, and she has a bit of that same polish CherryCrush has, but there's not much soul to the content. I unsubbed pretty quickly. I don’t think I’d ever be tempted to resubscribe. Pass.