This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
33
No, Wikipedia is NOT a credible source
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body
I hear a lot of friends say this and it pops up a lot online, and I don’t understand why people consider Wikipedia credible. No website that allows you to edit its articles is trustworthy, and no I don’t care if the site has moderators. If anything a site that has user moderators is only going to have the mods go on a power trip (look at Discord and Reddit as examples).
Author
User Suspended
Account Strength
0%
Suspended 1 year ago
Account Age
3 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
816
Link Karma
18,898
Comment Karma
4,911
Profile updated: 1 week ago
Posts updated: 1 year ago
Subreddit
Post Details
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not
always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare
these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
- Posted
- 3 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/The10thDent...