Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details
0
People who have posts of theirs re-posted by others for entertainment don’t deserve to have their usernames/profile pics censored
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

On all forms of social media, millions of people create millions of posts every day and most of them are pretty tame; however, there are some that are absolutely hilarious or incredibly stupid to the point where people post them on Reddit or other websites and show them to the world.

But many people believe it is a requirement to censor their identities/handles when sharing their posts. I do not agree with this. Why would I bother with hiding someone’s picture or username when sharing a post I found amusing when the person who created the post obviously was fine enough with it to be posted on an open, public forum?

Our social media pages are available to the public, unless you specifically hide your profile from those who are not friends or following you, and individuals hold every right to hide their content prior to posting. If they do not deem it necessary to make their accounts and posts private, why should I bother with doing that for them?

Essentially, if you want to post something, by all means have at it. But be ready to either defend what you post or at least be willing to take criticism for it. And if you are worried about someone taking something you post out of context, take a second and contemplate if it is good to post.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
5 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
19,763
Link Karma
12,288
Comment Karma
6,930
Profile updated: 6 days ago
Posts updated: 2 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
3 years ago