Election cycle means we can ask presidential nominees their stance on Fail-To-Delivers (FTDs) and Na...

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

877

Election cycle means we can ask presidential nominees their stance on Fail-To-Delivers (FTDs) and Naked Short Selling

Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)

🧱 Market Reform

Post Body

I challenge you to ask the nominees how they feel about the rampant short selling in the market. Fail to deliver being used as a cheap trick to never settle. SEC is not acting 100% faithfully to the people, looking out for the best interests of the wealthy criminals who game the system. Fines for millions of the billions they stole.

Big bonus points if it’s on television or in front of a group.

Max points if it’s asked during the debates. Watch their worlds flip, make a meme out of their face when they hear it 😬

Author

Account Strength

100%

Account Age

12 years

Verified Email

Yes

Verified Flair

Total Karma

26,107

Link Karma

8,673

Comment Karma

16,827

Profile updated: 17 hours ago

Posts updated: 11 months ago

dmt_sets_you_free

Subreddit

r/Superstonk

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.

Posted: 1 year ago
Reddit URL: View post on reddit.com
External URL: reddit.com/r/Superstonk/...