Listed from the most to the least transactional.

Reminder:  regardless of the type of support, ALWAYS get your money upfront before being intimate.  Also remember to always observe what he does rather than listen to what he promises. “Potential” and carrot dangling doesn’t pay the rent or for that Bermuda vacation.

Master Allowance Thread Soon To Be Updated

Pay Per Meet (PPM)

 Pros:  

1. Most prevalent kind of arrangement on Seeking so easiest way to get some money coming in.  The PPM model is about immediate gratification.
2. Good for people who can only meet occasionally for one reason or another and when both have very hectic schedules which might not always align.
3. Good if you prefer a more transactional and clear cut SR with limited contacts between intimate dates (closer to UTR escorting).
4. Great  way to maximize the $ if your SD wants to see you several times a week.
5. Perfect if you are not very reliable or don’t like your SD. The money will give you an incentive to meet with him

Cons:

1. Favorite support model for cheap johns, ppm daddies, men juggling several SBs rather than providing properly for one and “hit and quit” types.
2. Often confused with pay per fuck. Closer to discount escorting than a traditional SR.
3. Makes it difficult to have a more organic relationship with short or platonic meets (good luck getting a ppm if you just get together for lunch with your SD).
4. Does not provide you with consistent support. If one of you cannot (or doesn’t want to) meet that week, you will be left empty handed.
5. Makes budgeting difficult since you won’t know whether you will have an income coming in from one week to another.
6. Expect some difficulties with ppm daddies wanting overnights or long weekends/vacations but not willing to provide additional $.
7. PPM daddies will expect free emotional labor and communication in between dates. They want to have their cake and eat it too. Know what type of relationship you have and act accordingly.
8. Focus is on the “sugar” aspect and is not conducive to the relationship side of things.

Weekly and Biweekly Allowance

Pros:

1. Both have the same pros (to a lesser extent) as the monthly allowance discussed bellow.
2. It is the perfect way to start a SR if you are not sure whether you will enjoy your SD’s company or not. If you realize you do not care for him at all, you can drop him at the end of the week (or two weeks) instead of trying to hang on for a month.
3. Money hits your cashapp (make sure you get it cash the first time) on a regular schedule.
4. Good compromise. If your potential SD says he wants to do PPM “until trust is built”, tell him that you understand and that a weekly (or bi-weekly) allowance is a great way to balance the sugar with the relationship while building  trust.
5. It is a good way to see if a new SD is too clingy and expects way more meets and attention than you are comfortable providing.
6. Perfect way to weed out the hobbyists and "hit and quit" types. Not all gentlemen who do ppm are johns but all hobbyists do ppm.

Cons:

1. Same as the monthly allowance model discussed below but to a lesser extent.
2. Some PPM daddies brag about tricking women into doing ppm by telling them it is a weekly allowance. The money should hit your cashapp (or whatever) on the same set day like clockwork whether you are meeting several times, one time or not that week. Do not let slick men fool you.
3. It doesn’t allow you to budget properly. Your SD might decide to drop you at a short notice (one week or two weeks).

Monthly Allowance

Pros:

1. Consistent support.
2. Allows your to plan, budget your monthly expenses, savings and more.
3. Allows for a more organic relationship with the money matters being out of the way.
4. Perfect if you genuinely like your SD and want to have platonic or impromptu dates with him.
5. Perfect if you two go on vacations or spend weekends together. There won’t be any awkward discussions such as “how much ppm should I get”?
6. More likely to transition to a SBF or kept woman type of relationship (or even getting the bag if it is what you want ;)  )
7. SDs who do monthly allowance tend to have a more generous mindset and gift and “spoil” more.
8. SDs tend to be more respectful because they see it more as a “real” relationship and less like a transaction.

Cons:

1. Not good if your SD is clingy and wants the maximum “bang for his bucks” unless  you agree in advance to a minimum and maximum number of meets and make it basically a prepaid ppm.
2. Problematic if you have difficulties with time and/or money management.
3. Not good if you are unreliable (he will start resenting you and end it).
4. Not good if you do not enjoy your SD’s company. With the allowance being prepaid (as it should) you will lack the motivation to meet with him.
5. A consistent and generous financial support might make it easier to overlook abusive or otherwise unacceptable behaviors(such as boundary pushing) from the SD.

 Other Types of Support:

I have also heard of quarterly, bi annual and annual allowances. Pros and cons would be similar to the monthly allowance model.

Credit card, Debit card, joint bank accounts: This is perfect for SBF/SGF relationships . I would advise to steer clear of men who propose this on Seeking as it is potentially scammer territory. If your SD wants to transition to this model or your new BF wants give you a card, go for it! There are pros and cons enough to be discussed in another post.

Experience Daddy/gift Daddy :  better known as dating a generous wealthy man. Stay away from those on Seeking. This is PUA territory and they have guides out there to con women into sleeping with them by carrot dangling.

If your SBF you met organically or freestyling takes  you on cruises, remodels your home, installs central AC, buys you a car etc.  it can easily add up to much more than receiving an average ppm or allowance.  This is perfect for women who are already established and have a good job.

 Just be careful: don’t sleep with him until he has already contributed and always observe what he does rather than listen to what he promises.