This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
"Production for use," where the direct production of use-values, as opposed to exchange-values, is the primary aim of the economy, is sometimes held (especially by Marxists) to be core to what socialism is, in contrast to production for profit. But does production for use necessarily imply, say, planning done in kind (i.e., without intermediate measures of value or money)? Is planning necessary (but insufficient), sufficient, or not needed to achieve production for use? What conditions separate production for use from production for profit?
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 7 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/Socialism_1...