Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

64
to the people who think sly 2 is better than 3. Why is that?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Comments

Pretty much the only thing wrong with Sly 2 is Clock-La is a pretty meh final villian. But even then, she isn't awful it's really only the name, so I overlook it. But the story, villians, the gang, the open world, the missions are all A .

For Sly 3, there are one or two meh levels, depending on who you ask. Specifically, Rumble Down Under. It isn't by any means the worst in the series, but out of the OT it's definately at the bottom with only one real standout mission at the Lemonade Bar.

So while yes, An Opera of Fear is phenomenal, and the rest of the episodes are good, if not great, Rumble Down Under takes it down a hair, plus add in the half finished gameplay style of Panda King, the Ship, and the downright unpolished RC sections you still have a game that is a solid A-.

Really, the only thing Sly 3 has on Sly 2 is Dr. M. Probably the best villian of the whole franchise, who has a really challenging boss level after a phenomenal parkour dungeon.

TLDR: Sly 2 has a A game with an A- final villian, while Sly 3 has a A- game, with an A villian. The game is weighed heavier than the villian, so sly 2 just barely edges out Sly 3. Both are still great though. Top 10 games for me.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
4 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
21,739
Link Karma
14,021
Comment Karma
1,288
Profile updated: 2 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
2 years ago