Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

69
Finger cots are *not* condoms
Post Body

Hello, I've just seen a post bringing up a tiny dick and ladies were recommending a provider use finger cots.

Finger cots are NOT condoms.

Would you use a nitrile glove instead of a condom if a client asked? No? Then why would you use a single finger of one as a condom.

Just because it is called a finger condom, does not make it an actual condom

Finger cots are only meant to keep debris out of wounds, their porosity is such that at the very least HIV can get through them, and a host of other bacteria and viruses as well. On top of which, they rip easily, as they are not meant for the friction that comes with sex.

If it isn't a condom, do not use it as a condom.

(If you really have a micropenis situation the FDA approved Lorals latex panties as a barrier product that effectively prevents STIs like a condom would. I would suggest popping them on yourself, putting lube between you, and sliding around on him like a slip and slide.)

Comments
[not loaded or deleted]

It's a stupid thing to do as well. Gloves are not the same and theyre going to find that out the hard way.

Any girl working full service at a strip club should always stash condoms in her customers pockets if raided by the cops. It's not sus for a customer to have them, or at least not prosecutably sus.

If no customer is available during a raid, a male bartender or security guard's pockets are just as safe. That's just a man looking to get lucky after work, not a sex worker.

[not loaded or deleted]

It's an FDA approved barrier for preventing STIs and pregnancy. It's perfectly fine as a solution if used properly. I commented regarding finger cots because they were not perfectly fine as a solution.

My interpretation of the topic was not that it was about providing a better experience for a client, but a safer one for the provider; She can't provide the experience he wants because it's unsafe for her. So... it was about saftey.

[not loaded or deleted]

I see, you're talking about clubs that aren't ok with extras. I was thinking about clubs that are fine with extras, so long as the cops don't catch you.

[not loaded or deleted]

Female condoms are a little unattractive, other than that my only concern would be that with a true micropenis (one too small to even really penetrate) or with a very small penis (one prone to slipping out) that the penis would end up on the side of the ring instead of inside the ring of the female condom. Leading to skin-on-skin contact, or even ejaculate to unintentionally contact or enter the vulva and vagina.

They're also difficult to get. Perhaps that's why the lack of support?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
5 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
20,083
Link Karma
1,129
Comment Karma
18,803
Profile updated: 5 days ago
Posts updated: 6 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
7 months ago