“SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology as suggested by the reporting surrounding the lab leak hypothesis. The details of this program have been concealed since the pandemic began. These details can be found in the EcoHealth Alliance proposal response to the DARPA PREEMPT' program Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HR00118S0017…

SARS-CoV-2's form as it emerged is likely as a precursor, deliberately virulent, humanized recombinant SARS-COV that was to be reverse engineered into a live attenuated SARSr-Cov bat vaccine. Its nature can be determined from analysis of its genome with the context provided by The EcoHealth Alliance proposal. Joining this analysis with US intelligence collections on Wuhan will aid this determination.

When synthesized with the EcoHealth Alliance proposal, US collections confirm EcoHealth Alliance was performing the work proposed. The analysts produce their reports in a vacuum, absent the context the proposal provides. As a fellow at DARPA, I could see both, and can do the synthesis.

SARS-Cov-2, hereafter referred to as SARSr-CoV-WIV, is a synthetic spike protein chimera engineered to attach to human ACE2 receptors and inserted into a recombinant bat SARSr-CoV backbone.

It is likely a live vaccine not yet engineered to a more attenuated state that the program sought to create with its final version. It leaked and spread rapidly because it was aerosolized so it could efficiently infect bats in caves, but it was not ready to infect bats yet, which is why it does not appear to infect bats. The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking ride on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm. The closer it is to the final live attenuated vaccine form, the more likely that it has been deattentuating since initial escape in August 2019”

Source: https://assets.ctfassets.net/syq3snmxclc9/2mVob3c1aDd8CNvVnyei6n/95af7dbfd2958d4c2b8494048b4889b5/JAG_Docs_pt1_Og_WATERMARK_OVER_Redacted.pdf

Full Project DEFUSE Proposal: https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/main-document-preempt-volume-1-no-ess-hr00118s0017-ecohealth-alliance.pdf

DRASTIC Analysis of Project Defuse Documents: https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/20/1583/

These documents were released in late 2021 without much press. Through project veritas by a former DARPA fellow named Joseph Murphy. The project was denied by DARPA for having risky Gain of Function research but later funded by the NIH. As far as I know the US govt refused to confirm but also did not deny the legitimacy of these documents.

They are mentioned in this US Senate letter https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/services/files/A5D718FE-B85D-40BE-824A-76FCDD5F7BDB

And also on this page on the European Parliaments website. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2022-000179_EN.html

I’m not saying these are facts, just honestly curious if this lab leak explanation makes sense theoretically to science nerds on here now…

With recent revelations by congress that scientists involved in the “Proximal Origins” paper supported the lab leak in private on slack messages I think this gives this a bit more credibility now too.

Please debate!