Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

126
Why do so many mental health providers think that you need an ROI to speak about a mutual patient? Or am I wrong in my understanding?
Post Body

I feel like this is a topic that is not well understood by a lot of people in medicine, as evidenced by people confidently giving completely contradictory statements.

It's a daily obstruction to appropriate patient care, especially on the inpatient units.

My understanding is that provider to provider communication does not require ROI consent or signature from patients. See the linked pdf below from HHS, which says we as providers are free to talk to each other, and that while psychiatric information has some special privileges, one of those privileges is not raising walls around providers.

So why am I constantly being stonewalled by other providers and hospitals with regards to information release?

Are there state to state laws where its different, or is mental health privacy primarily delineated just by HIipaa?

If it is just broad misunderstanding but people who work in medical records and by other providers, can we get a list-serv email from APA? Or maybe pitch in together to get a super bowl commercial?

https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hipaa-privacy-rule-and-sharing-info-related-to-mental-health.pdf

Author
Account Strength
90%
Account Age
4 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
752
Link Karma
216
Comment Karma
536
Profile updated: 5 days ago
Physician (Unverified)

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago