This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
I am a progressive/social democrat. To many on the far left, I am just a “liberal”, to many on the far right, I am a socialist. To moderates, I am not moderate enough.
I say this because I personally believe, as I get older, that the notion of ideology as a basis for societal change…is problematic.
I don’t mean this to say ideology is inherently bad. I don’t mean this to say that there isn’t a realm for it. Ideology can inspire various discussions—it’s a discourse into the “possible” (but many times not probable).
But I think ideological purity—basically indoctrination—IS bad.
Ideology can create unrealistic expectations. Ideology is a useful tool to inspire thinking but no ideology has ever proven to survive the nature of reality and human nature. One way or another, it gets corrupted and slowly corrodes.
Everyone speaks of “this” economic system or “that” economic system like it will be a cure all. Or “this” political system or “that” political system like it will FINALLY deliver true utopian bliss. The truth is that no system is perfect, all ideological views have negative consequences and we, in reality, have to concede this in order to ever make any sort of meaningful contribution to society.
People often lambast bipartisanship in the US (I am absolutely one of them) but we need to realize that perfect policy can never exist in a universe where we all hold different values and ideals.
Me, personally, I try to let myself define what my values are with some occasional ideological research and “inspiration”. But I think indoctrination into ANY ideology is akin to writing a fictional story but only allowing yourself to write about themes that others have already discovered instead of discovering your own ideas that hold unique meaning to you.
In a vacuum, it's not.
When it's an entire system built around the idea of infinite growth that's physically not possible in a context of finite resources.
You're focusing on the individual pieces of the system while missing the overall point that the system itself, if it operates as intended, is destined to fail.
"I can't identify problems with what you said so I'm going to attack what I perceive your beliefs to be instead."
Ok, I guess.
What I don't get is how you can come up with "eco-capitalism."
Capitalism at its base is a system that demands an increasing accumulation of wealth and resources. A system that demands infinite growth.
A system that demands infinite growth in a finite environment will eventually consume that environment in its totality and that's what we're seeing happening now. The profit motive will always win when its pitted against environmental concerns.
I say this because I personally believe, as I get older, that the notion of ideology as a basis for societal change…is problematic.
All societal change is based on ideology. You make changes for a reason and that reason is informed by your ideology.
What you're describing sounds like a tent so wide it effectively has no walls and I'm unclear as to the benefit of that.
Everyone speaks of “this” economic system or “that” economic system like it will be a cure all. Or “this” political system or “that” political system like it will FINALLY deliver true utopian bliss. The truth is that no system is perfect, all ideological views have negative consequences and we, in reality, have to concede this in order to ever make any sort of meaningful contribution to society.
Welcome to what most people over the age of 16 have worked out?
It's not about how much revenue you make, it's about how fast you make it.
Long term investments will generally have more of a return than short term ones but if you stack a number of short term investments you can often outperform a long term investment. That basic premise is what motivates the kind of quick turnaround thinking that characterizes American capitalism - $10 today is better than $100 next month because I can then take that $10 and turn it into $500 in a month.
It's what spurs the kind of destructive extraction economics that makes capitalism so poisonous and it's an inevitable outcome of a system that demands infinite growth. This is what capitalism is, no matter how many prefixes you slap on it.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 9 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/PoliticalDe...
You cannot maintain an economy on trees. We're not elves.