Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

2
First vs. Corresponding Author: Which Holds More Weight?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

Hi all, I am a 3rd year PhD student.

Our lab recently finished a manuscript and is preparing it for journal submission. Initially, my PI said I would be the first author, a postdoc would be the second, and the PI would be the corresponding author. However, my PI just informed me of a change: the postdoc will now be the first author, I'll be the corresponding author, and my PI will be the last author. The rationale is that this would help the postdoc secure a tenure-track job while being the corresponding author will benefit my CV and give me experience dealing with journals.

To be fair, our contributions were split 50-50, so I'm partially okay with the change. However, I'm a bit disappointed that this wasn't discussed earlier.

Does being a corresponding author matter as much as my PI suggests? For context, I already have another manuscript under review where Iā€™m the first author. What are your thoughts on this?

Author
Account Strength
50%
Account Age
2 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
176
Link Karma
97
Comment Karma
79
Profile updated: 1 month ago
Posts updated: 3 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
5 months ago