Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed (Author was flagged for spam)

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

2
Direct LOS locked LRMs: Trajectory buffs vs Velocity buffs.
Post Body

I think Russ(?) said something at MechCon about considering making direct line of sight locked LRMs have a different trajectory than LRMs that were indirect fired. (I'm not sure there was even a full sentence said about it, so if I misheard this someone please correct me.)

It got me thinking about how to "reward" people for using LRMs right, aka direct-fire. I was wondering if direct fired LRMs could have a velocity buff. (Or equivalently, indirect locked LRMs could have a velocity nerf.)

The idea being that if you're holding your own locks, you don't have to expose yourself out of cover for as long. This also makes the Target Decay nodes more useful, since faster missiles will get to the target before the lock drops. And it makes the velocity nodes in the skill tree less important, so you can take either ammo or armor/struct nodes instead. Both of which are nice to have for LRM boats.

In short, I feel like buffing velocity for direct fired LRMs is a better way to reward "good" LRM play than making their trajectory flatter. Which I feel won't really change things much, and so players won't modify their behavior. Also, a flatter trajectory has a downside - it makes it less likely the LRMs will hit an enemy behind low/partial cover.

What do you think?

Author
Account Strength
0%
Account Age
17 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
80,053
Link Karma
5,035
Comment Karma
74,430
Profile updated: 8 months ago
Posts updated: 9 months ago
Clan Wolf-in-Exile

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
6 years ago