This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Hear me out on this, but I believe Scott Steiner is eligible to be a boy based on one simple fact alone: his titles reigns and his career after WCW.
Sure, he held the world title on a few occasions, but nobody was really watching when they happened, and the only memorable moment was dropping the title to Booker T on the final Nitro.
Sure, he got some world title matches against Papa H in WWE, but they were horrendous, and he never sniffed the main event picture for the rest of his run with the company.
His run in TNA alone should give me a solid case to keep Steiner in my boys stable.
I would love to hear some opinions on this, definitely interested to hear what other people think.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 1 year ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/OSWReview/c...