What’s the logical argument for being inclusive while also being intolerant of intolerance?

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

Post Body

I’m curious about this logical idea. I know there’s an answer but I can’t quite put my finger on it.

Being inclusive seems to imply tolerating all opinions - but does this also mean being tolerant of hateful rhetoric? What’s the moral/ethical/logical argument for disallowing hate while still maintaining an inclusive attitude?

As an example:

I work at a bar that’s known for being the most inclusive space in a very socially-conservative area. How can I claim to be inclusive, when kicking out patrons who act hatefully? It’s a caveat I can’t overcome in my head. What’s the answer here?

Author

Account Strength

100%

Account Age

14 years

Verified Email

Yes

Verified Flair

Total Karma

400,549

Link Karma

182,312

Comment Karma

216,606

Profile updated: 13 hours ago

jeckles

Subreddit

r/NoStupidQuestions

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.

Posted: 5 months ago
Reddit URL: View post on reddit.com
External URL: reddit.com/r/NoStupidQue...