Hi all. I've done over 100 reviews already and so far there are a few trends I'm seeing that I'd like some extra clarification on, or rather, I'd like to know how you handle these.

Here are some examples:

• Frisbee golf or golf holes - especially when many others at the same location have also been nominated (eg. Hole #8, Hole #16, etc).

• Community parks with multiple possible POIs. In this case, does the park actually need a POI for everything? Let's say there is already an entrance sign, tennis court, baseball field, basketball court, 3 gazebos/shelters, and a walking trail. Do all of these actually qualify, or should it be really only focused on things such as the park entrance and gazebos?

• Going off the previous one - what about parks that feature several tennis/basketball/baseball fields/courts? I've seen many submissions now where it was like "Baseball Field 7", and the other 6 were evidently also submitted. This seems egregious to me, but what do you think? Continuing this, I've seen the suggestion that baseball fields technically count, but a sign is very much preferred. I've been getting a lot of generic baseball fields and have begun to skip over them because, while it seems that they count as a waypoint, it seems to me there is a distinct difference between some small park baseball field and one actually used by teams, complete with a sign or scoreboard.

• Office building artwork. I've seen some large office buildings that have original pieces of artwork on the inside. It seems to me this might be an instance of dropping a low score for pedestrian access, but determine everything else as usual? Again, with this one I've seen some varied answers, from people saying it's all around totally acceptable, to others saying that it doesn't meet the criteria for a POI period due to being within an office space.

That's really all I've got for now, everything else I've encountered has been pretty much either a clear yes or a clear no. If anyone could help clarify some of these, I'd really appreciate it!