Updated specific locations to be searchable, take a look at Las Vegas as an example.

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

142
In an interview with the New York Times, Trump claims that the United States is not required to uphold NATO, arguing that it is an outdated alliance. Is this true?
Author Summary
xhytdr is in New York City
Post Body

In his interview with the New York Times, Trump argues that the United States is not required to defend NATO member states that do not pay the pledged 2% of their GDP to the alliance. Trump surrogate Newt Gingrich went even further, arguing that NATO members that weren't meeting their pledges were sources of weakness, not strength. However, Democrats and other Republicans are reportedly angered, with Mitch McConnel stating that "NATO is the most important military alliance in world history. I want to reassure our NATO allies that if any of them get attacked, we'll be there to defend them."

Who is right here? How important has NATO been for geopolitical security in Western Europe? Furthermore, what implications could this have on geopolitical stability?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
14 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
147,515
Link Karma
20,143
Comment Karma
127,002
Profile updated: 3 days ago
Posts updated: 6 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

Location
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
8 years ago