Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

25
New filings regarding motions to compel, hearings, IGG, and alibi
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body
Comments
[not loaded or deleted]

👍👍👏👏👏👏 Excellent series of summaries of these motions/ documents - very useful and much appreciated by us non-lawyers

[not loaded or deleted]

cause me to question the competence of the prosecution if they don't actually know how cell phones work

What if the phone was just switched off - there would be no GPS or other location data?

What is more likely - the phone was switched off at 2.47am, or the phone lost cell service while in the centre of a University town surrounded by 5 AT&T towers, and then travelled to near Blaine passing close to another 8 AT&T towers without regaining any cell service?

his phone prior to not connecting to the network showed him in Canada, would that not be relevant

It would, but his location derived from phone data at 4.48am is well within 28 minutes travel from King Road, so cannot be an alibi. Similarly the last known location at 2.47am is not exculpatory.

Any GPS data would have been obtained post-arrest, so would be subject to the gag order and cannot be made public pre-trial.

While the tactics and argument look more than a bit disingenuous, one must have more than a sneaking regard for Ms Taylor's efficacy at using these filings and motions to make public her point, despite the subject area specifically being sealed and the gag order. This part of the motion to unseal IGG seems to ask and answer and make the exact point, without any actual unsealing....:

https://preview.redd.it/l9j3iukh6kxc1.jpeg?width=652&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4d5e3603bc7318c363dc1de220a8be8d14df8cf6

If the basis for "FBI violated own rules" is correct, we could perhaps assume that genealogy service was accessed using the public portal that does not allow LE use?

Author
Account Strength
90%
Account Age
5 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
4,030
Link Karma
1,293
Comment Karma
2,737
Profile updated: 1 hour ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
6 months ago