Lawsuit by Dr. Stewart Lucas Murrey: plaintiff vs. AWDTSG posters and moderators.

I really do hope this case makes it to litigation because it will become case law on hate-filled discussion echo chambers like AWDTSG. It would be a huge tragedy if the defendants negotiate a settlement with the plaintiff BECAUSE THEN THEY SKIRT ACCOUNTABILITY, and vacate the legitimacy of this situation which is not unique to Lucas Murrey.

To be clear most men would have no objection to a government run website that lists sex offenders who have been proven convicted of crimes related to attacking and raping innocent victims.

AWDTSG users proclaim that their mission is to publicly warn women and out men who have been "disrespectful", nevermind that there was probably some toxic trigger that elicited the terse response from the man. Clearly the desired outcome here is to reduce the dating options of certain men who were previously flagged by women years prior allegedly due to a disrespectful text or verbal exchange.

The crux of the legal case hinges on the DIFFERENCE between defamation/ slander versus First Amendment expression of opinion.

Three women were specifically named in the Plaintiff's blog:

Kelly Gibbons: verbatim from website:

https://archive.org/details/dr-murrey-statement-21-march-24/page/n6/mode/1up

After matching with and giving my number to Kelly Gibbons aka Kel Culb Gib aka kcg, I became suspicious of the cagey nature of her heavily-filtered images and lost interest. The only thing I did to Gibbons was block her. Instead of moving on, she went online and vindictively posted my picture in a Facebook group that she felt was a “safe-space to call out guys that have been disrespectful”. For about a year, she constantly bumped her own post about me to incite more reactions while also creating many posts gossiping about other people, one who was deceased and could not harm anyone.

For years at least, if not more than 238 Facebook accounts, mostly anonymous and/or fake, commented on Gibbon’s post about me. Out of these accounts, I have thus far only named ten (10) individuals in my lawsuit who have stepped over the line and broken the law. It is likely I will add a few more. These allegations include libel, false light, invasion of privacy, sexual discrimination etc. Out of the 10 defendants, I briefly met one for less than 15 minutes and do not recall meeting any others.

One of the defendants, Elly Shariat, had the gall to fabricate a totally impractical story that I matched with her on a dating app and appeared at a hotel where she was dining. I have never met this person in my life, I certainly do not recall having any interest in her, and I do not have any record of communication with her.

This action is not a game, and the accusations against the defendants are serious. For years key defendants obsessively tracked, stalked and incited harassment against me. These are women with whom I had little to no interaction. In every case of interaction, I rejected each one of them and cut them off, quite swiftly. Instead of going their separate ways, they went on for months and years to spread misinformation about me and countless others. Their actions were deliberate, and they are now playing the victims.

I would like to preface that I support a safe space for women to protect themselves against being stalked, harassed, or harmed, and not the other way around. These women exploited the concept of a safe space to gossip, defame and cyberbully anyone at whim. Not only is this illegal, it is overwhelmingly selfish on their part to put their needs and amusement over the privacy and rights of others.

To give you a glimpse of how far these defendants go, please take a look at two of them (Kelly Gibbons and Olivia Burger) being admonished by others in the above-noted images.

Gibbons, above all, misinterprets this concept of a safe space by stating, “this is a safe space to call out men who have been disrespectful”, after satirically calling out the ability to gossip about people who are not able to defend themselves. And Burger also uses Facebook pointings to trash people she has never even met.

Olivia Burger

Again, these are women who value privacy for themselves, but do not see that as a right for others.

Even as they have a pending lawsuit against them for defamation and invasion of privacy etc., they are creating webpages and contacting the media to broadcast their blatant misrepresentations, which is, in the least, absolutely foolish on their parts. After reviewing their interviews and postings, I would like to address a few points:

1. The only thing I did to Olivia Burger was reject her. This is why her story is missing any substantiating circumstance of wrongdoing to her. When I met Burger, I felt her pictures concealed certain attributes and lacked the overall perspective from her total in-person appearance. Let me be clear that this meeting should not be categorized as a date. I do not want to be referred to as someone who went on a date with Burger. Within a few minutes, I ordered a pizza away from the location and made an excuse that I had to pick it up. I ended the interaction

and fearing that I had been insensitive, sent her a text the next day stating: “The pizza was delicious. I was pretty tired, sorry.” Afterwards, I never thought about her again, until it came to my attention that she was obsessively writing about me and stating my name in multiple Facebook groups. It even came to my attention that she talked about me on podcasts, immediately after I rejected her. However, she has gone on TV misrepresenting that “she ended the date early and didn't think about him until years later.” (KCal News Interview) Burger even states, “I have never had a date like this, ever.” However, please take a look at her own post where she states that she met a married man, practically off the streets, and invited him to her hotel room whereupon he also made an excuse to disappear. In what sense can anyone believe my unremarkable meeting and quick exit away from Burger was by far the most egregious event she has had with a man?

Vanessa Valdez

1. Regarding Vanessa Valdez: it was not my first interaction with her. She had matched with me before and she chose to do so again. From my recollection, we have never had a successfully pleasant conversation and I rightfully cut off the connection with her. From that moment, I never contacted her again. I never thought of her again. However, Valdez was a big contributor in these conversations invading my privacy and inciting harassment. Whereas I left her alone, she is the one who pursued this mob rule against me. I am the victim, here.

2. In their GoFundMe page, they have a post by a person named Ely Shariat, who completely fabricates a wild story about going to a hotel and encountering me. I have made it clear to all defendants that this story is pure fiction, and yet, they put this on their GoFundMe page to deliberately shed me in false light.

These very acts and theatrics, alone, are exactly the definition of defamation, false light, and invasion of privacy. I am just one individual having to juggle the effects of these women who keep coming after me while I had no interest in any of them.

I would also like to point out that this is not like a Yelp review of a business. Yelp is an open forum. The Facebook groups denied me and countless other our right to exercise freedom of speech by denying us access to said Facebook groups so we could defend ourselves. I believe the moderator, Paola Sanchez, is jeopardizing both women and men. She is only self-interested and will help herself, not you. It is a shame that she leads a rather large group of women who are from various backgrounds, many that might not have the best intentions or acumen.

This is a case of prosecuting people who invade privacy, skew facts about others, harass others, and cyberbully. They thought they could get away with it. This is a case that must go to trial and prevail so that we all can enjoy real free speech without fear of being violated.

Since then, these defendants have appeared on national TV and created a website alleging that I sued 50 women and committed acts which in truth and actual fact never occurred. These lies have spread across the nation and I will therefore be adding slander and unjust enrichment to my complaint against defendants.

In short, most women don't spend all their time making trashy posts on Facebook. The acts of these defendants are hate-fueled and unrelentless; said Facebook losers rage in their war against people who have no idea they have been targeted. One can name them a female version of incels: “femcels”. The glue of their group is their hatred of men. Worse, there is clearly an even darker side to this conspiracy. Said Facebook groups are known to have caused people to lose their livelihoods. In some instances, innocent people die. These serious crimes against our democratic constitutional republic designed to protect our peace and happiness can be traced back to the non-chalance, misrepresentation and unlawful “guidance” from Facebook administrators and/or moderators, including Paola Sanchez.