So,in the finale for appetizers,Christine made Thai Papaya Salad with Crab and Mixed Vegetables and Josh made Butter Poached Lobster.Josh’s dish was more complex than Christine’s but he undercooked the lobster.Christine’s was more simple but she pretty much nailed the execution.What baffles me is that Gordon and Graham argue that even though Josh didn’t execute the dish properly,he had the better appetizer because he tried to do something he’d never done before.They even make the admission that he didn’t cook the lobster properly but that he should win that round because he “went out on a limb for the finale”.Joe says that he can’t reward people who don’t execute what they set out to execute and that even though Christine’s dish was more simple her’s was better because it was cooked correctly.The first time I saw this part,I was so confused,like yeah he tried something different but he didn’t do it as well as he could have,i.e undercooked.Am I crazy here?