Good evening and Thank you for joining me.

Yesterday I was made aware that the Leadership and Presidium of the PWP have decided to suspend all contact with my leadership and I and have taken the same approach with Coalition. In a situation where the Home Secretary lied to the House, to the government and to his party, the PWP are trying to frame us as the bad guys. They claim to be loyal to Eddy and yet make wild and often contradictory actions and statements as seen in the last 24 hours. They are clearly a party out of their depth struggling to keep their head above water, allowing emotions and pettiness to dictate their thinking, rather than the good of the country and good governance. How do they intend to proceed as a member of the government when they refuse to work or even communicate with the leaderships of ⅔ of the largest parties? How do they expect Minister's questions to work - will they refuse to answer them and boycott their ministerial duties? It wouldn’t be surprising. Will they be able to work with any of our devolved branches if a member of our leadership team is an elected representative? Where does this boycott begin and where does it end? To the Prime Minister u/KarlYonedaStan, do you really think this is behavior fitting of a Home Secretary and Coalition partner and do you support such a boycott? How as Prime Minister can you seek to deliver unity and pragmatism in politics when you have such a divisive force as a partner?

The actions of the PWP, in regards to both the boycott and the floated legal action against the Times, for reporting the truth highlights a worrying trend of the PWP and its members to aggressively lash out at any form of criticism, despite its validity. While I am not childish enough to stoop to such a low of a boycott or demand such an apology I will note that this has damaged relationships needlessly. If the PWP wish to defend lying to the House, a Vote of No Confidence offense then that is down to them, but to try and paint the opposition as evil for doing their job is not only wrong but bad for our politics. I severely and unequivocally condemn this move.

I would now like to invite my Shadow Secretary of Justice, AG and SG, u/milnix_ to talk about a legal case we will be pursuing.

Thank you Sir Chi,

Like many people across the country, I am shocked and appalled at the government’s and in particular, the Prime Minister’s crass disregard for the law both domestic and international. It is for this reason, that I have begun proceedings to challenge the Prime Minister on his illegal appointment of KalvinLokan to the office of Home Secretary.

Kalvin’s appointment as “Acting” Home Secretary, made whilst Model-Eddy still occupied the same office, was in contravention of convention, statute, and common law.

We trust that the Court shall rule in our favour, and come to a decision that is in line with centuries of settled, uncontroversial law dating back to the very inception of the office of Home Secretary. Neither the government nor the Prime Minister is above the law, and we believe that justice shall be done, and when it is, that the Prime Minister shall do the right thing and resign