How can we make quad actually be held accountable to give a response to MHOCMeta suggestions? JGM's 2 very reasonable meta suggestions 1 and 2 from 5 and 6 days ago are still not responded to, Lords Committee changes were proposed in October 2020 and not implemented until January 2021. Things all the time just get ignored unless the person who posted the goes out of their way to make a big deal and continue pinging the quad member concerned. Last time I personally posted a meta suggestion it took 5 days to get a response, and that was with multiple pings to remind quad not to forget it in the mean time.

Repeatedly pinging quad isn't fun for quad, it isn't fun for the person with the meta suggestion, and too often it leads to things just being ignored if the author forgets/doesn't care enough to check up on it. I feel like we need some kind of formal submission procedure where all serious meta suggestions are actually noted down with a designated quad member who needs to reply, or at the very least there to be some kind of accountability procedure if they don't reply. I'm open to suggestions for other means of accountability, but the status quo is tiring.

Update 25th Jan: It's now been 3 weeks and 8 consecutive community suggestions that have gone without a reply.