Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

3
Lords legislative procedure
Post Body

If we are going to have a MHOL and one which can propose Lords bills, can there be debate on them before they go to vote? Currently bills are introduced and only amendments can be submitted initially. If no amendments are submitted, then the bill moves on to the final vote. If amendments are submitted, only then there is a reading stage.

It seems odd to me that LBs can go to a pass/fail stage of the legislative process without having any guaranteed debate stage at all. I understand that the reforms were done to make things more streamlined and move debate to the Commons but surely LBs can be an exception. All Commons bills will have had at least one chance to be debated on r/MHOC before reaching the Lords after all and it only seems fair to have debate first. To me it is important since it creates a chance for people to set out a position and ask questions about a proposal before voting on it.

I would suggest having a second reading/debate stage for all LBs to start with before moving on to other stages. If need be, this could be merged with amendment submission to mirror the Commons process and keep things more streamlined.

Author
User Disabled
Account Strength
0%
Disabled 4 months ago
Account Age
4 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,261
Link Karma
305
Comment Karma
896
Profile updated: 3 days ago
Posts updated: 7 months ago
MLA

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
4 years ago