Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

5
Status on Vote of No Confidence in the Commons and Lords Speakers
Post Body

Good afternoon everyone,

Yesterday I received a document outlinging the reasons why those presenting the VoNCs to me were doing so. I also received a document of the names of the signators to these VoNCs.

As per the constitution, A6:S1:I, the VoNCs have to be submitted with a list of reasons of why they are being presented, which they are. The constitution also states that there must be 40 signators which are any mixture of MPs, MEPs, Lords, moderators of /r/MHoC and /r/MHoL and individuals approved by the Head Moderator at the time it is presented. The signators presented do not meet this requirement, with a total of 47 names being submitted, but only 36 meeting the criteria required.

For this reason, the VoNCs are rejected.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
10 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
6,881
Link Karma
625
Comment Karma
6,256
Profile updated: 6 hours ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago
Lord

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
7 years ago