Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

3
Employment contract requires me to waive 48-hour week limit rights, is this enforceable?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

From my understanding quite a few types of contract can't force you to waive statutory rights e.g. tenancy agreements and employment contracts. If they contain clauses that do, they are not enforceable (or so I have been told/read).

In the case of the 48-hour a week (average) work limits, it is possible for employees to opt-out of the limit voluntarily and agree to give a certain notice period (7 days to 3 months) to cancel the opt-out and regain their right. From what I can tell it is not allowed for an employer to force an employee to opt-out (including firing for not complying), nor are they allowed to force an employee to cancel or not to cancel the opt-out, which makes sense.

However, I can't find any advice on employment contracts that state that you agree to waive the 48-hour limit (phrased in the correct terms for the opt-out).

My working theory is that the 48-hour waiver would be invalid and safe to ignore because:

  • If I am not an employee when signing the contract, the conditions of the opt-out would not be met as defined in the act: being an employee and voluntarily opting-out.
  • If the contract implies that I am required to and will therefore automatically opt-out as I become an employee (and that this is a condition of my employment) then it is no longer voluntary.
  • If the contract is actually a direct waiver of my statutory right and not an opt-out, it is not legally enforceable.

I have a record of me asking to have it removed but was told it couldn't be nor that I could actually trigger the cancellation (despite it clearly stating I can with 3 months). I think their legal department is bullshitting but legal departments do that and this isn't really a big deal for me, I have no reason to believe I'll be asked to work more than 48-hours a week on average and I will happily leave if I am.

I'm asking more out of interest since this a legal area that's difficult to navigate (I hate law) and I can't find any advice on this exact situation. Is my theory correct in that, since this is part of an employment contract, this doesn't count as a voluntary opt-out of the 48-hour working limit?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
11 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
131,879
Link Karma
930
Comment Karma
129,927
Profile updated: 1 day ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
5 years ago