This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Hi guys,
I'm taking Agency and we spent most of the semester on partnerships and limited partnerships. The last day of class, the professor briefly addressed LLCs and the piercing the veil doctrine.
I think I understand it for the most part; however, I'm struggling with when an LLC can be treated like a partnership and, I guess, how that works.
Is it sufficient to say that if the LLC holds itself out as a partnership, it will then be treated as a partnership? And if it's not disclosed as an LLC, it defaults to a partnership for the specific issue that is being disputed? Further, if any statutory prerequisites aren't fulfilled, the LLC will then also be defaulted to a partnership for the issue that's in dispute? I feel like I'm missing something still. I get that once it's treated as a partnership, all of the agency issues come into play. I'm struggling with when it is treated as a partnership though.
If anyone could shed some light on this/ELI5, that'd be great :)
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 10 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/LawSchool/c...