Today I come back to JK's idea after 10 years of reading and reflecting on his proposal on love, ego, conditioning and other topics. In JK's interesting thinking it seems important to me to identify several Remarks on his methodology. It seems to me that in all these interviews his questions are oriented with answers already ready from him. For example, he questions the ego but he is already arguing that it belongs to thought and consciousness and when confronted with the idea that the ego is part of the physical reality of the brain he retorts with his idea of the evolution of conditioning. Have you noticed or am I the only one to detect these modes of answers and questioning