This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
I wonder if someone can shed some light on this situation:
- We have a firewall (SRX 320) in a remote country with 2 x ISPs
- Each ISP has 2 x IPSec tunnels : 1 to DC1, 1 to DC2 (so 4 x IPSec tunnels in total) back to SSG 350 firewalls
- DCs are connected via L2 links for routing routing purposes - each site has main different subnets
- All devices in area 0
- Latency between remote site and DCs = 60ms
if I disable ISP1 on the remote site OSPF on the remote site, OSPF functions as expected on the SRX. Each neighbour from each DC advertises their own routes and when disabling/re-enabling a neighbour the exchange takes place within a reasonable time frame (seconds).
If I then enable ISP2 it can take hours for the neighbours to each the exchange state.
If I then disable ISP1 neighbours and re-enable, one will reach Full state quickly, the other 3 are stuck in Exchange state for hours until reaching Full state.
So I don't think there is an issue with the VPN - throughput is pretty good on each 100Mbps link and latency is fairly consistent at around 60ms.
We have many remote sites operating with a single ISP and a VPN back to each DC on faster and slower links and the same hardware/config, and route changes from the DCs are propagated to the remote sites within seconds, but this is the first site with dual ISPs I am trying to configure this way.
I can only get one neighbour of the four to reach full state quickly, then the other 3 are always in Exchange state for hours until they reach Full state.
Can anyone give me any pointers, as I don't think something is right here - thanks
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 5 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/Juniper/com...