This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
So I propose instead of arguing about how we should have better discussions and expressing how annoyed we are, we just produce better conversations — more centered on Jung and his ideas.
I spent years away from academia, but after discovering Jung a few years ago, I've decided to pursue another degree. Currently getting a degree in English, hoping to get into a graduate program centered in Jungian/Post-Jungian studies. But for now:
This is a paper I wrote trying to combine the topic of my course (Survey of American Lit) with Jungian ideas. I'm interested to see what you all think of it — where I got Jung's ideas right, where I got them wrong, if it brings anything to mind for you, or you can tell me how awful I am, no biggie! Just trying to get some better discussion going.
As you can tell from the date, this is an assignment from last July — so I'm not just trying to get this sub to do my work for me — already graded and long past!
I'm curious if you'd like to see more content like this or not — I'm currently working on my thesis project where I'm trying to write an original piece of literary criticism from a Jungian perspective and I've done a lot of research and found a lot of really interesting things. (Currently reading Susan Rowland's Jungian Literary Criticism (2006) and Cliffton Snider's The Stuff Dreams Are Made On (1991) and I've found a ton of really interesting Jungian approaches to literature through my research if anyone is interested!)
TL;DR — I wrote a paper months ago. Currently doing more research and more writing. Is this a better content direction for this sub?
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 1 year ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/Jung/commen...