This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
I have such a hard time grasping how so many people who want liberation and justice for all indigenous people are against the first successful decolonial movement (Israel). The same people who argue for āland backā are the same ones who are against an indigenous population returning to their ancestral homeland and reviving their mother tongue as a spoken language. I find the double standards appalling since Iāve also noticed a lack of support for other indigenous people in the region who live under Arab occupation (Kurds, Assyrians, Copts, Druze, etc). Is it simply because these groups donāt fit the narrative of the āwhite oppressorā vs the ābrown oppressedā?
Weāve proposed countless peace offerings with neighboring Arab countries, and weāve done so much to try and make their situations better. Yet almost every single peace offering has been sabotaged and destroyed by their own unwillingness to acknowledge Israel. My question is why donāt these people see Israel as a decolonial movement, despite Jews being indigenous to the land? And why canāt they see that Israel has tried making countless deals with Palestinians that would give them a state?
My pet theory, personally, is that their morals align with decolonization but they also (usually) live on stolen land so more indigenous sovereignty might be personally inconvenient for them.
So they reconcile this by attacking the successful decolonization movement (Zionism) and giving loud lip service to decolonization movements with low chances of success.
Itās a way to cover up the ways they act against their values while risking almost nothing.
Hence all the US and US-influenced antizionists
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 10 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/Jewish/comm...