Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

13
The real reason for a no-contact "prime" directive
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

A lot of sci-fi's have a no-contact directive for developing worlds. There are different reasons given for this, but the one that almost no sci-fi dives into is this: pandemics.

In Earth's history, the american colonists could never be cruel enough to compete with nature. It is estimated that smallpox killed 90% of native americans.

With futuristic medical technology, the risk of a pandemic spreading from a primitive civilization to an advanced one is small. But in the other direction? Realistically, almost every time Picard broke the prime directive should have resulted in a genocidal pandemic on the natives. Too complex of a plotline, I guess.

And if the advanced civ tries to help with the pandemic they caused? The biggest hurdle to tackle would be medicine distribution and supply lines for a large population with minimal infrastructure. Some of the work could be done with robots, but it would certainly require putting lots of personel on the ground, which would likely just make the problem worse.

Comments

Transporters contain filters. Next.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
10 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
445,094
Link Karma
85,807
Comment Karma
355,244
Profile updated: 4 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
3 weeks ago