This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
30
Would O'Neil cylinders be more vulnerable to authoritarianism and genocide?
Post Body
I've heard the argument that because resources are scarce and oxygen can be cut off, O'Neil cylinders would tend to fall under dictatorships or just be eliminated in "oxygenocides", making dyson swarms unwise and keeping planets as the main centers of civilization.
Comments
planets
Plural
Find me an oxygen rich Exoplanet with terrestrial conditions and plant life and we can entertain this hypothetical.
Otherwise the sole difference is whether your hab is at the bottom of a gravity well or not.
[not loaded or deleted]
Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
3 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
16,328
Link Karma
5,699
Comment Karma
10,394
Profile updated: 2 days ago
Subreddit
Post Details
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not
always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare
these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
- Posted
- 3 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/IsaacArthur...
Very true. The calculations for comparatively high precision strikes with exactly the amount of fallout desired aren't exactly trivial but anyone you'd allow to fly a spaceship around could likely do it with a ruler and a pen.