This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
This is admittedly quite a sci-fi sunday sort of post, but something's been on my mind for a while now. In the context of the future, are visors on a helmet really any good? Yes, the full-faced visor view is a clear call back to astronauts, but those were there because technology like miniature cameras and displayers weren't invented at the time. Technically now if we wanted to we could build an EVA suit with a VR headset and cameras built in instead. And once the lag and field of view are improved, ditto military and combat helmets too. In fact they're already doing something like this in jet fighter helmets. In the future we often discuss this would be trivially easy and common place. And before you say "a transparent visor is redundancy in case of system failure!", that suit's air pumps are responsible for you breathing so if you didn't shield it against EMPs or hacking then you already got much bigger problems.
So is there really a need for a traditional see-through visor in helmets, especially for space or combat? Wouldn't it be more prudent to armor the faceplate and just have cameras/sensors?
#3 may go out of style in favor of the other options with smart VR/AR HUDs.
I feel for combat applications it runs into a similar somewhat morbid issue as using robots for holding territory -- When you have a way to take out the enemy in a way that doesn't kill (in this case cutting the helmet feed and trapping the now-blind soldier in his armor) you're working much cleaner which is wonderful for PR.
Ergo militaries might eschew it because manipulation of the camera might have their soldiers shot at less.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 7 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/IsaacArthur...