Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

1
Company says that because my new rental residence cannot be insured then they don't cover from $0-$300k on the house in a different state that I own and rent out.
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

How curious that the renter's insurance I had in a different state would somehow cover the first 300k of insurance on the house in Kansas that I own and rent out. Beyond 300k the umbrella covers it, they tell me. They did not tell me this for months, until recently. I am unhappy with this company for their inability. Unable to continue home insurance coverage for a customer of several years that has never made a claim?! I don't even really need renter's insurance on my new place in California but would get it if that would get me coverage on my house. I want to change umbrella, home, car over to a company that can handle it all properly and cost effectively. I welcome advice. Thank you.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
6 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,334
Link Karma
650
Comment Karma
601
Profile updated: 1 week ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
4 years ago