Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

16
How are Navy and Airforce requirements different for fighter jets such that TEDBF can not have both Navy and IAF versions?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

It makes sense for both Airforce and the Navy to benefit from TEDBF as the Navy will only be inducting close to 100 jets. Beurcrectic hurdles aside, doesn't it make sense for the Navy and Airforce to both invest in TEDBF? That way, we can easily fast track TEDBF program and satisfy Airforce's requirement for twin-engine MRFA instead of importing 90 Rafaels and spending $20-$25 Billion. From the way it seems, MRFA will only be signed 3-4 years from now and it will take 5-7 more years for all aircrafts to join IAF as Rafael's assembly line is busy with orders from other countries.

Just a newbie, so I am curious to know exactly why this can not happen.

Thanks!

Author
Account Strength
20%
Account Age
2 years
Verified Email
No
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
164
Link Karma
30
Comment Karma
134
Profile updated: 1 week ago
Posts updated: 2 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago