Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

0
How did they know?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

Forgive me if this has already been answered or is an obvious question, but how did they know to zero in on Bryan to test their DNA in hopes of matching it to him? Like how did they know about him or suspect him?

I know they found the DNA on the knife sheathe and were able to confirm it as his by testing the fathers DNA from garbage they obtained, but my question is HOW did they know it was Bryan in which they were trying to match the DNA to?

Duplicate Posts
3 posts with the exact same title by 2 other authors
View Details
Comments
[not loaded or deleted]

LE didn't know it was a white Elantra that was driving around the King Rd house.

Oddly this is exactly opposite to what is written in the PCA - that suspect vehicle 1 was seen at King Road was identified as a white Elantra. Do you not think the FBI and police considered that video of the car at King Road might be included in the trial?

[not loaded or deleted]

Any of that would have been SO much slower it would not have been worth it

I don't follow. All of that seems mandatory and required. We know they did exclusionary testing with DNA from friends, exes, boyfriends. We know they did DNA testing from people under surveillance. Of course they tested every DNA swab with a profile. I think they would have started IGG only after none of those matched the sheath/ no hits in CODIS.

[not loaded or deleted]

my opinion that LE would have lost no time moving on to getting the IGG investigation started

You don't think LE would have (1) complete analysis of all DNA from scene (2) run all DNA profiles that qualified through CODIS (3) completed exclusionary testing of friends, exes, partners etc ....

...before doing IGG?

[not loaded or deleted]

it was issued when Othram took on the job

interesting, but would still mean IGG would have reported results/ tip well after the WSU police flagged his car on Nov 28/29 I think?

[not loaded or deleted]

we already argued as nauseum about this?

😀👍 i think we have. You do however keep making leaps and bounds using non-existent data/ evidence as a springboard.

CODIS check was done by November 20, which allowed the. IGG process to begin.

This being an example - because STR profile of sheath DNA was done Nov 20 does not mean IGG started then. More logical would be that STR profile was then compared to all gathered profile (friends, partners, exs) voluntary and obtained by police surveillance (e.g discarded cigarrette) - when all of that did not match, would be a logical start for the IGG.

If indeed Othram invoice was issued that would indicate start for IGG - is that firmly confirmed? If Nov 27 still likely runs well past the date the WSU police flagged his car though....

[not loaded or deleted]

ojnly identified as a white Elantra after they had IGG identified Kohberger

Seems unlikely and a very, very bad fit with likely dates - IGG likely around Dec 19-20. Phone warrant, surveillance of Kohberger etc after that. His car flagged at WSU Nov 28.

[not loaded or deleted]

creation of the STR profile to compare it to known suspects.

Yes - also to compare the sheath STR to the various friends, bfs, exes and people of interest/ under surveillance, with mix of voluntarily given DNA and surreptitiously acquired profiles ( discarded ciggarrette etc).

Author
Account Strength
70%
Account Age
3 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,267
Link Karma
1,039
Comment Karma
228
Profile updated: 19 hours ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
5 months ago