The cartel would use noise complaint calls by LE

Only when signals transmitted into dental fillings were impeded by poor reception in the tunnels.

A lot of cognitive dissonance in this case

Yes indeed. Here we have 2 instances in 6 months described as "frequent". It is barely plural, let alone "frequent". It is dissonance mixed with commentary : dysentery. Kohberger was pulled over for crap driving at a frequency several times higher than this over a shorter time period.

The "drug house" lunatic story (it doesn't even qualify as a "theory" as a theory is a basis to explain observed facts or events; like all other Proberger fairytales it is totally lacking any supporting facts or observed events) is both loon fantasy and profoundly disrespectful to the victims as it implies fictitional criminal activity by them was involved in their deaths.

Interesting snippets re MM and 1115, and the previous tenants at 1122, I had not been aware of these, thanks for sharing.

There is no relevance to them

An odd choice to post them here then, perhaps. You mentioned the noise complaints as being related to "weirdness". If they are in fact totally unconnected to the murders or ongoing case as you now confirm, your post may have fallen just a little short of coherence or comprehensibility.

indirectly related circumstances

I confess to growing more confused. In what way, directly or indirectly, do the 2 noise complaints relate to the murders or the case?

Yeah like 2 or 3 within just a couple months seems like a lot to me

1 police call specific to that house, and 1 other visit in 6 months. 2 does not seem "frequent". Kohberger had double the interactions with police, being pulled over 4 times, in half the time. By your frequency scale Kohberger's dangerous driving must have been incessant.

What is the relevance/ significance of 2 police visits to that house in 6 months preceding the murders?

Your reference to "frequent" police visits is in the paragraph before you mention finding these 3 from 2024, starting "Originally I thought" and refers to the police visits at 1122 pre murders (if not, it makes very little sense)

They took place at the same house…..

So, your position is that a noise complaint at the same house as the murders may have some direct/ indirect connection or tenuous association with the case, but Kohberger's DNA found in the house on a sheath under a dead body is quite unrelated to the murders and is not incriminating. Fascinating.

How aerobic

Cell phone pings can pick up a cell phone miles away.

I think you are confusing a connection to a tower, which indeed can be over miles, with localisation, trilateration, which calculates a phone's position using data from multiple towers. The latter can be accurate within 100 metres - and is the basis for FCC regulations mandating 911 calls be locatable within 50 metres using cell tower data.

This case, linked, has testimony from an eminent world expert academic in this field, who notes localisation of a phone within 78 metres using cell tower data.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/feb/25/theo-hayez-inquest-mobile-data-suggests-belgian-backpacker-climbed-headland-before-vanishing

The AT&T NELOS system, using cell tower data, has an accuracy within c 300 metres from published examples; triangulation of phone location from cell tower data would likely be similar or closer. Not sure when the PCA was written if each of the 12 instances of late night visits were specifically calculated locations, or from AT&T system or a mix of triangulated positions and proximity to a tranceiver/ in the transceiver sector including King Road. I think likely it shows he was in the area, but to ensure the PCA could not be challenged no exact figure or range is quoted - phone data was only obtained Dec 23, the PCA was drafted by Dec 27th, so may have been quite rushed.

How confusing